COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TRADITIONAL VS. CREATIVE VISUAL-AIDED METHODS IN SCIENCE EDUCATION
Date of Award
2025
Document Type
Thesis
Degree Name
Bachelors
Department
Natural Sciences
First Advisor
Clore, Amy
Area of Concentration
Natural Sciences
Abstract
Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics subjects (STEM) have classes that may be challenging for students because they often cover a lot of material quickly, making it difficult for students to remember key concepts. One possible way to boost student motivation is by using visual-aided methods, such as interactive graphics, wordplay, characters, or stories. These connect to their interests and make the content more engaging. This study explored whether incorporating visual aids into a science curriculum helped middle school students better understand and retain scientific knowledge. Two small cell biology diagrams were compared: one used visual-aided methods (characters, wordplay, fun visuals), and the other followed a more traditional science diagram. Students at Pine View School in Osprey, FL took a quiz to see which diagram was more effective in instructing them. Their results were inconclusive, likely due to the gifted school setting. All students earned a 100% on the quiz, regardless of the diagram type. Nonetheless, based upon my literature review, there is evidence that blending science lessons with engaging, visually driven examples helps boost their understanding and enthusiasm for learning, especially for younger students.
Recommended Citation
Ginsberg-Klemmt, Ari, "COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TRADITIONAL VS. CREATIVE VISUAL-AIDED METHODS IN SCIENCE EDUCATION" (2025). Theses & ETDs. 6737.
https://digitalcommons.ncf.edu/theses_etds/6737