Author

Zachary Conn

Date of Award

2017

Document Type

Thesis

Degree Name

Bachelors

Department

Social Sciences

First Advisor

Fitzgerald, Keith

Area of Concentration

Political Science

Abstract

Hannah Arendt and Michel Foucault, both relatively recent additions to political theory’s canon, often are thought of as inhabiting separate theoretical camps: civic republicanism and postmodernism, respectively. This thesis argues that these labels obscure significant overlaps between their thought and stifle the possibility of productive engagement. I seek to show, contrary to much of the secondary literature, that nothing in Arendt and Foucault’s basic positions on methodology, ontology, and normativity necessitate that we must a priori dismiss a reconciliation between the two thinkers. This thesis makes the case for the possibility of a Foucauldian politics of the public sphere and attempts to dislodge Arendt from interpretations which view her as a nostalgic, foundationalist thinker. When read against certain common interpretations, striking similarities emerge between Arendt and Foucault’s thought on freedom, which ought to be taken up in future work.

Share

COinS