Progressive Bullying How Unilateral Actions Could Help International Fisheries
Date of Award
2010
Document Type
Thesis
Degree Name
Bachelors
Department
Social Sciences
First Advisor
Alcock, Frank
Keywords
Fisheries, Regional Fisheries Management Organizations, International, Unilateralism
Area of Concentration
Political Science
Abstract
As the governing bodies of international fisheries, Regional Fisheries Management Organizations have largely failed to protect key stocks. This failure has led to unsustainable harvests that threaten the future of several key fisheries. Although many studies have focused on alleviating their inadequacy through institutional or policy changes, they have often ignored the underlying problem: cooperation among member states. Through an examination of the key variables for cooperation as applied to international fisheries, this thesis demonstrates that attaining legitimate cooperation between member states may not be possible through multilateral governance. Because multilateral governance may not be possible, unilateral actions by key states could offer the only hope for successful management. Under specific conditions, powerful states can achieve sustainability through unilateral action. By using their leverage in the fishery, these states can promote compliance from those who may not prefer regulation. Although this dynamic may not sound equitable, it may be the only hope for preserving fish stocks.
Recommended Citation
Mewhirter, Jack, "Progressive Bullying How Unilateral Actions Could Help International Fisheries" (2010). Theses & ETDs. 4303.
https://digitalcommons.ncf.edu/theses_etds/4303
Rights
This bibliographic record is available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication. The New College of Florida, as creator of this bibliographic record, has waived all rights to it worldwide under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights, to the extent allowed by law.